DOMestic Bdsm and Female Domination

The Fem Dom Training Program. Warning!
Turns your wife/lover into a Dominatrix.

* * * start of the digest * * *

admin: June to September 09 update
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:37:35 +0100
From: "Christine" at u4ds.com

Hello,

I've now completed and uploaded the June to September 09 update
update to the members web site.

Supporters of DOMestic can see the latest at

http://u4ds.com/2009/09/september_30th_2009.shtml

and access or search the last 13 years of DOMestic.

If you don't have a password you can search at least 3 months of
DOMestic using the search box at...

http://u4ds.com/

sincerely,
Christine at u4ds.com

You can support DOMestic at
http://www.mschristine.com/domsub4.shtml#card

* * * next message * * *

Re: C: Chastity Question, Is "Milking" Just The Myth That I Think It Is?
From: Madamplz
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:09:37 EDT

jazzclassic wrote:

>I do think that the necessity to milk is a myth, a myth put
>forth by men.

slaveboy wrote:

>My gut tells me the same thing

Does it occur to you that perhaps Mistress might be the one who
needs to milk?

Vicki Tern wrote:

>Which has little to do with a main humiliating effect of
>"milking,"

Yes, exactly.

sub ray wrote:

>"Mistress has not yet tried to do it, but with a prostate
>plug, i am able to leak a lot."

Some men leak a tremendous amount of pre-cum depending on the
stimulation. I once used a TENS anal plug with a urethral TENS
plug and placed electro pads on the boy's balls. He leaked non-
stop, profusely for at least an hour. Good times.

* * * next message * * *

Re: C: Chastity Question, Is "Milking" Just The Myth That I Think It Is?
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:55:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: Pietro Bianchi

There is no research, to the best of my knowledge (I am a
urologist) that has seen any benefit to the prostate with
milking or massage. The nocturnal ejaculation happens only in
some men in some cases. IT is anyway a sort of "emergency"
emptying and not the normal process thought by nature to empty
the prostate. Whether the semen is spurted out the normal way or
goes into the bladder depends only on the tone of the internal
sphincter, and has nothing to do with the health of the
prostate.

Ejaculation is an "active" process, where muscles of the
prostate and seminal vesicles contract and the content is
expelled from the gland. This is supposed to avoid the build up
of some toxins inside the gland, and is believed to be the
reason for better prostate health in men with more frequent
ejaculations.

As I write, we don't know if milking-massaging produces the same
effects and results. By the same token we don't know if wet
dreams or dripping at times provide the same benefits (by common
sense probably not - personal opinion).

I am not saying that prolonged denial is unhealthy, but that we
simply do not know. I think it is childish to pretend that
everything "we" do is safe, and getting to that conclusion by
reasoning. There is no reasoning in biological things, we've
seen that several times.

Prolonged denial is not "natural", when a male is aroused, by
nature, it is meant to ejaculate. It is pleasurable, for some
people for some reasons, to be forced not to do that. Fine for
them (I am one of them by the way), but why pretend that it is
perfectly safe and healthy?

* * * next message * * *

Re: C: Chastity Question, Is "Milking" Just The Myth That I Think It Is?
Date: 22 Sep 2009 22:51:21 -0000
From: slaveboy

Madamplz wrote:

>Does it occur to you that perhaps Mistress might be the one
>who needs to milk?

No, not in my case. She definitely does not. But, now that you
have responded to this, I have been meaning to ask you a
question about a former posting concerning strap ons, where you
ended it with a question like "Why would I want to be inert?" if
I recall correctly. I would love if you would elaborate on that
if you can. It kind of left me "hanging" as to what you meant.
Thanks!

David's thoughtful answer has been duly noted. I guess I should
have added "in a healthy individual" but apparently there is the
concern by some that remaining chaste for long periods could
cause a problem.

Pietro Bianchi wrote:

>There is no reasoning in biological things, we've seen that
>several times.

I believe that there is a logic and a reason for everything that
occurs in nature, but I would love to hear more about what
examples you are referring to.

You also said:

>Prolonged denial is not "natural", when a male is aroused, by
>nature, it is meant to ejaculate. It is pleasurable, for some
>people for some reasons, to be forced not to do that. Fine for
>them (I am one of them by the way), but why pretend that it is
>perfectly safe and healthy?

Why "pretend" it is not healthy, given the way it makes me feel?
I'm healthier than I've ever been, I'm in the best shape, (I
work out much more now that I'm chaste) I'm the most in love,
and my mental state is better than most of my life and most of
that comes from chastity.

As I said, I believe everything in nature happens for a reason,
and I believe that the good feelings that come from chastity
occur for a reason. I am only speaking for myself but chastity
works best for me, and if every two to four weeks, minimum, my
58 year old body finds a way to expel it, I don't really think
I'm pushing any biological or physical limits to a level that I
need to be concerned about.

Mentally, I am finding that chastity takes me to places I cannot
otherwise go and the result has me wanting to journey farther
into chastity. I am finding things out about myself that I would
otherwise not know. It is something that needs to be experienced
beyond the initial frustration that is to be expected. Moving
beyond there can be highly enlightening, at least it has been
for me.

Chastity offers the opposite of the "down" that accompanies many
if not most orgasms, but being an accumulation over time vs. the
single act of one orgasm, I believe it has physical benefits,
rather than perils and risks.

I do this not out of "belief" or ideology, but empirically, from
my body, just the same way as I can tell that a food is good for
me after eating it, or that junk food is bad for me, after
eating it.

Not to argue with anyone here, but I have to believe my body and
my experience when it tells me that chastity is good for me. To
me that is only logical. Someday that logic may let me down, but
at 58 I feel comfortable that it has served me well this long
and will probably continue to, based on experience. I trust my
body and that has served me well.

"Expert" medical opinions come and go and we usually find out
that what we all take for granted is often proven false with the
next round of scientific discoveries. I'll MUCH rather trust my
own body, thank you very much.

sb

p.s. That is why I called our chastity devices website
chastityheaven and not chastityhell :-)

* * * next message * * *

Re: C: pleasure punishing or from dominating her man?
Date: 22 Sep 2009 22:00:22 -0000
From: slaveboy

Joe wrote:

>Do Mistresses really get excited punishing or otherwise
>dominating her man or do they just fake pleasure?

It's a question I have pondered and in the early days I thought
I was being put on, but now I know that it can be true. I guess
it would depend on the Mistress as well as the situation.

I once snuck a look at a questionnaire my Mistress answered and
one of the questions I saw was something like "Do you get added
sexual pleasure from denying your slave any sexual pleasure of
his own" and she answered "yes".

If "teasing" falls under the category of "dominating" then I
definitely think some Mistress' absolutely do get pleasure from
some types of domination. I know mine does. She really enjoys
teasing me, knowing I cannot do anything about it because I'm
locked up.

Thank goodness for that natural "high" David wrote about in
response to my milking question. When Mistress very explicitly
teases me, as She recently did, the high is wonderful. She had
me get into an uncomfortable position, knees bent while standing
on tip toes, hands clasped behind my neck.

As long as I could hold my position, she continued to tease me
with a foot show, this was right after having me give her a
pedicure. It was wonderful and had me totally intoxicated so I
continued to hold the position until my thighs really burned. I
was high and she was turned on, judging from what happened
after.

http://www.chastity heaven

* * * next message * * *

Re: C: pleasure punishing or from dominating her man?
Date: 22 Sep 2009 23:52:26 -0000
From: Rachel

I really get excited when I am able to show off my power over my
husband in front of my girl friends. I really start leaking when
I make him kiss and massage my feet in front of my sister and/or
mother or tell him to drop his pants to show them the lacy
panties I make him wear and his cock locked in the CB-6000.

I don't know how to describe the feeling but I really get turned
on.

Rachel

* * * next message * * *

Re: C: pleasure punishing or from dominating her man?
From: "Just Saber"
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 18:21:21 -0500

Joe asked:

>Do Mistresses really get excited punishing or otherwise
>dominating her man or do they just fake pleasure?

I can't speak for others but speaking for myself, the answer is
a resounding YES! But then I am a semi-sadistic Dominant

Saber
AKA Miss Stress
http://misssaber.4mg.com

"Vocabulary enables us to interpret and to express. If you have a limited
vocabulary, you will also have a limited vision and a limited future."-Jim Rohn

* * * next message * * *

Re: P: fag pig dog bitch - online or phone slave
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 03:51:26 -0000
From: m - "starfox27588"

Hello,

I am a 28 year old a male (Atlanta area) looking to become a
full time online, text, or phone slave. I am just a pig for your
fun. Make me beat my cock until I cry. My cock is only 3 inches
when hard.

Make me into an animal, a pig, a sissy, whatever you wish. I am
a toy for your fun. Take control of my life as much as you wish.
Do to me as you wish. Ask and I'll give out my phone number.

Starfox27588

wakefeildjr@gmail.com

* * * next message * * *

Re: P: out of the closet Phoenicia NY
Date: 23 Sep 2009 03:29:35 -0000
From: shywon

glennbonne mentioned:

>"i am seeking a dom woman or couple to own me. anything goes, i
>know where i need to be, at a woman's feet to serve"

"Anything" encompasses a lot. We will own you, just send us all
your cash after you empty your bank account. (sorry folks,
couldn't resist)

Please don't say "Anything goes" if you don't want to give up
everything - including your life. Thanks

* * * next message * * *

S: In The Bank Manager's Cupboard. Part Thirty-six
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:31:21 +0100
From: "Christine" at u4ds.com

Previous issues.

In The Bank Manager's Cupboard - by Ms. Christine
Copyright 1986-2009 Christine and David Stevenson

Part Thirty-six

Christine slipped the belt between Table's body and the
table top. She strapped it tight beneath him and fixed
the expansion straps, pulling the foreskin right back
to fit one behind his penis head.

Catrina appeared on the video screen, ordering David
onto his belly to lick her boot heels, as she stood legs
astride and arms akimbo.

Catrina liked to order slaves to lick her long stiletto
heels while she stood thus. The slave could look up her
skirt, if she were wearing one, satisfying her exhibitionism.
At the same time frustrating the male sexuality, her sadism
stimulated by the grovelling of the male beneath her.

Madam Kwai, seeing that the 'facility' was now free,
went upstairs to enjoy her turn. Her 'Table' was now
under the control of Christine, the vibrator still
degrading him internally. Christine was now
experimenting with the faradic equipment.

Sadine, Karin, Marique and Christine were all
entertained by Catrina's show. Karin was playing her
hand aimlessly over Pippa's nether regions while
attentive to the screen.

Christine similarly had two shows to amuse her.
One on screen, the other being 'Table' writhing with
alternating brief pleasure and intense discomfort.

Catrina was now sat on David's bed, legs spread. David
was obeying her orders to lick her boots from the heels
to the tops.

David had considerable difficulty complying with her
instructions, his hands still secure behind his back.

Catrina threatened, "Make a good job of cleaning my
boots, you are already in trouble for ogling me earlier,
you don't want me to double your punishment for sloppy
service."

David shook his head as he struggled to his knees to lick
further up. Catrina laughed at his efforts as she enjoyed his
tribulations.

When David had completed the boots she put his mouth to
use on her breasts and nipples.

Sadine confessed to Marique, "I hope she gets around to
punishing him soon".

Marique replied, "She likes to savour a man's submission
and servility first"

A loud moan came from 'Table' as he ejaculated in
response to Christine's torture.

As the ladies all applauded the spectacle, Christine
informed them, "He won't enjoy it, but I think I can
induce orgasmic spasms every five minutes or so".

Karin enquired, "Won't that give him too much
pleasure?"

Christine assured her, "Oh No! After the first two
he'll be dry, it will be more pain than pleasure".

Karin declared, "I can't wait to get mine, I like the
idea of milking David without giving him pleasure!"

Christine agreed, "If you bring about his first two
orgasms quickly, then you can give him another dozen
or so without giving him much pleasure at all.."

Sadine interjected, "That should be enough to put any
man off sex for a few days!"

Marique enthused, "I like the idea of using a sex slave
who has been drained, it should remove any lust or
pleasure from him while he fulfils my needs. That
should improve concentration considerably, I do so hate
it when they spend so much time thinking of their own
selfish wants!"

'Table' groaned, more from agony than pleasure, as
his penis pumped and contracted yet again.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

This story is one of over 400 stories you can read on the
DOMestic web site. For your password go to:

http://www.mschristine.com/domsub4.shtml#card

* * * end of messages * * *

The Fem Dom Training Program.
Train your husband/lover.

* * * end of digest * * *